Having thickened cranial vault bones, per heavily built face, thick-boned jaws, and thick postcranial bones may have been necessary, or at least an advantage, for the body to cope with these long lifespans

Some creationists see environmental factors and genetic effects, such as the founder effect, genetic drift, and inbreeding, as most likely sufficient onesto explain the differences in skeletal features between modern humans and so-called cavemen. 37 It has been proposed that there was per period of rapid human diversification beginning during the construction of Babel, resulting mediante extreme morphological variability durante post-Babel humans repopulating the earth. 38,39 Other creationists believe the stark difference per morphology between robust and anatomically modern humans warrants an explanation per nell’eventualita che, that is, not just an acknowledgment that there was considerable variation sopra features, but why.

Verso subject of importance to the creation model is explaining why the skeletons, particularly the skulls, of humans such as Homo erectus (as well as those classified as Neandertals and Homo heidelbergensis), were so rugged or robust compared onesto anatomically modern humans

As such, it has been suggested that Homo erectus, Neandertals and the like all arose coraggio ‘devolution’ from anatomically modern post-Babel populations-from the genetic consequences of inbreeding, drift, and mutational effects, after splitting off from anatomically modern humans. 40 However, this would have puro have happened independently, mediante verso relatively short time, sopra many different parts of the world, which seems a little too coincidental onesto be realistic.

Along with a number of other creationists who have contemplated this issue, I consider the robust human forms, such as those with the features observed sopra the typical Homo erectus and Neandertal remains, to durante general be non-pathological. As such, they were likely humans that were part of the original dispersion that occurred at Babel. Hence, an explanation that is worth considering is that the robust morphology observed durante these humans is linked puro longevity. According sicuro creationist Carl Wieland:

Hence, one explanation why humans such as Homo erectus, Homo heidelbergensis, and Neandertals, had different morphology compared esatto modern humans, particularly sopra the skull, is that it could reflect changes sopra development of these profili collarspace early post-Flood individuals, compared preciso modern humans, possibly linked to longevity. 42 A factor that cannot be ignored per per creationist model of human origins is the biblical long lifespans of individuals mediante the pre-Flood world, and puro some extent the early post-Flood earth, as derived from Old Testament records. Durante the pre-Flood world lifespans of around 900 years appear to have been common, and even individuals born early post-Flood (within per few hundred years of the Flood having occurred) are recorded as having lived for hundreds of years. 43,44

If initially (after the Fall) humans were designed puro live for hundreds of years, then this would most likely have per bearing on development processes and timings. Simply put, longevity would probably be associated with changes con development, not just the aging process.

If longevity was linked onesto development processes associated with the above-mentioned robusticity, then robust features would be expected to disappear with shorter lifespans, although, as Wieland libretto, “some of the genes coding for some of their distinctive bony anatomy were apparently passed on puro some of today’s populations”. 45 Hence, robust features do not correlate with the potential for longevity con recent times. Verso genetic mechanism for robusticity would possibly involve the control of hormones related esatto bone growth and maintenance. According preciso Susan Crockford, an evolutionary expert sopra this settore, the

Thyroxine (T4) is an important thyroid hormone, and a excretion thyroid hormone secretion pattern could have existed con people with robust skeletal morphology, such as Homo erectus and the Neandertals, linked puro the genetic mechanism for long lifespans. Add environmental influences, as well as genetic effects such as genetic drift, and you can possibly account for differences in the many skeletal features observed. This would be not only between early robust post-Flood humans, like Homo erectus, Homo heidelbergensis, and the Neandertals, but also between anatomically modern humans and these early robust post-Flood humans.