People.

400 and you can eighty-three players were recruited from a massive college inside Hong-kong as a consequence of advertisements printed from inside the university and you can places, size characters because of divisions and you will faculties, and you will snowballing. Evaluation took place in the a lab. Professionals completed the fresh gender salience size, brand new combined-sex nervousness level and reported the group record. Every actions was showed inside their original English code given that English ‘s the typical out of classes to own tertiary studies into the Hong-kong. This study is carried out in conformity on the information and recognition of your own University of Hong-kong Human Browse Ethics Committee (HKU HREC). Most of the subjects provided written advised concur according to the Declaration away from Helsinki. Parental agree wasn’t required by the newest HKU HREC for it test.

School banding was averaged if participants had attended more than one high school (only 4.1% of the total sample). Participants also reported their college year, total parental income and parental education, numbers of sisters and brothers, faculty, and sexual orientation. Students’ faculty was coded as male-dominated, female-dominated, or gender-balanced based on enrolment statistics . Sexual orientation was assessed using the adapted Klein Sexual Orientation Grid (KSOG) . Participants rated their sexual orientation in the past 12 months on four aspects, namely attraction, behavior, fantasy, and identity, from 0 (other-sex only) to 6 (same-sex only). The number of participants was roughly balanced by school type and student gender. Participants who had switched between single-sex and coeducational schools were excluded from analysis (n = 27). The final sample consisted of 456 graduates (239 females; 52.4%) who had attended 182 different high schools. These graduates either attended single-sex schools (n = 207) or coeducational schools (n = 249) for high school education. This sample size had over 80% a priori power to detect small differences (.26 < d < .30) at ? = .05, two-tailed . The sample was almost exclusively Chinese (97.6%) and aged years on average. The mean parental income of the sample (HKD42632) suggested that the sample was demographically similar to undergraduate students from several local universities (e.g., [58–60]).

Table 6 presents detailed participant characteristics by school type and student gender. Consistent with prior research [3,4,8], participants from single-sex schools had parents with higher education level, t(454) = 3.48, p = .001, and attended more academically excellent schools, t(387) = 4.26, p < .001, unequal variances, than did participants from coeducational schools.

Gender salience level.

Gender salience are measured by the exact same method utilized in Analysis step 1. The latest inter-rater precision is good for all of the responses (? ranging from .87 so you’re able to .99).

Percentage of almost every other-gender close friends size.

Part of most other-gender close friends try mentioned because of the exact same strategy used in Analysis step 1. Part of most other-intercourse family unit members wasn’t reviewed throughout the college or university shot.

Mixed-sex stress measure.

Like in Studies step one, participants said their blended-intercourse stress toward altered relationship anxiety level (DAS-A) . Compared to Analysis step 1, participants from inside the Investigation dos accomplished the full 21-goods brand of DAS-A for the reason that relationships experience was preferred on the college or university attempt (93.4% of your users advertised a world relationships feel; discover selection of matchmaking experience affairs about Relationships Records Questionnaire in Table D in the S1 File). People who got never ever dated prior to had been requested to visualize exactly how they will feel and you can respond on explained facts. Because of it full scale, ten products measured Concern with Bad Testing, seven activities measured Societal Stress within the Matchmaking Products, four things counted Societal Distress in Blended-sex Groups, and you will five filler affairs considering a break from score anxiety-associated products. The interior structure try good for full DAS-A great (? = .95), Anxiety about Bad Analysis (? = .92), Societal Distress for the Relationships (? = .89), and you can Societal Stress for the Blended-intercourse Groups (? = .80). While the the desire wasn’t just on the relationships stress and simply 2.6% of the university users stated that have zero heterosexual attraction whatsoever, matchbox support we included every people regarding studies out-of combined-intercourse anxiety and you may controlled to own intimate positioning.