E. (1952)

Jevons, M. P., and you will Parker, M. T. (1964). J. din. Highway., 17, 243-250. Lidwell, 0. Yards. (1959). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth., 18,49-52. Live, We., and you may Nichols, A beneficial. C. (1961).J. inject. Dis.,108, 195-204. Macdonald, An excellent. (1946). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth., 5, 230-233. Meyer, W. (1966). Zentbl. Bukt. PurusitKde., We . Abt. Orig., 201,465-481. Meyer, W. (1967). J. Hyg., Camb., 65,439-447. Nakagawa, M. (1960). Jap. J. moist. Res., 8, 331-342. Oeding, P., and Williams, Roentgen. Elizabeth. 0. (1958). step three. Hyg., Cumb., 56, 445-454. Pagano, J. S., Farrer, S. Meters., Plotkin, S. Good., Brachman, P. S., Fekety, F. Roentgen., and you will Pidcoe, V. (1960). Technology, N.Y., 131, 927-928. Parker, M. T. (1966). In the “The fresh new Scientific Foundation off Treatments Yearly Feedback” (J. P. Ross, ed.), pp. 157-173. University of London area, The fresh Athlone Force, London. Parker, Yards. T., Todinson, A. J. H., and Williams, R. Age. 0. (1955). J. Hyg., Cumb., 53,458-473.

New parasexual period as well as include in genetic studies

Pether, J. V. S. (1968).J. Hyg., C an effective d . , 66,605. Poole, P. Meters., and Baker, J. R. (1966). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth., 25, 116-123. Statement (1959). Int. Bull. bact. Nomencl.,nine, 115-118. Statement (1963). Int. Bull. bact. Nomencl., 13, 119-122. Report (1967). Int. Bull. buct. Nomencl., 17, 113-125. Declaration (1971). Int. Bull. syst. Buct., 21, 165, 167, 171. Rountree, P. Meters. (1959). J. gen. Microbiol., 20,620-633. Rountree, P. M., and you can Asheshov, E. H. (1961). J. gen. Microbiol., twenty-six, 111-122. Rountree, P. Yards., and you may Freeman, B. M. (1955). Med. J. Aust., 2, 157-161. Ruys mejores sitios de citas para solteros de pueblo, A. C., and you can Borst, J. (1959). Antonie wan Leeuwenhoek, twenty five, 237-240. Seto, J. T., and you will Wilson, J. B. (1958). Am.step three. wet. Res., 19, 241-246. Smith, H. W. (1948a).J. Hyg., C you d . , 46,7681. Smith, H. W. (1948b);Jp. Highway. Ther., 58, 179-188. Smith, H. W. (1954).J. Street. Buc

Tarr, H. Good. (1958). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth., 17, 64-72. Watson, W. A good. (1965). Veterinarian. Rec., 77, 477-480. Wentworth, B., Romig, W. Roentgen., and Dixon, W. J. (1964). J. contaminate. Dis.,114, 179188.

Williams, Roentgen. Age. 0. (1957). Zentbl. Bakt. PurasitKde., I . Abt. Orig., 168, 528-532. Williams, R. Age. O., and you can Jevons, Meters. P. (1961). Zentbl. Bukt. ParasitKde., We Abt. Orig., 181,349-358. Williams, R. E. O., and you may Rippon, J. J. Hyg., Camb., fifty, 320-353. Williams, Roentgen. Age. O., Rippon, J. E., and Dowsett, L. Yards. (1953). Lancet, i, 510-514. Wilson, G. S., and you may Atkinson, J. D. (1945). Lancet, we, 647-649.

Hereditary Data when you look at the Micro-organisms DAVID Good. HOPWOOD John Znnes Institute, Norwikh, The united kingdomt I. Addition . eleven. Segregation once the Evidence of Easy Genetic Handle . An excellent. The fresh new hereditary method of biology . B. Brand new detection out of segregation . 111. The cornerstone out of Hereditary Mapping . B. The brand new sequencing regarding loci to your good linkage map: multi-factor crosses C. Linkagegroups . D. Genetic good-build . Age. Deletion mapping . IV. Practical Hereditary Evaluation . A. Prominence screening . Bplementation evaluating . C. Epistasis . V. Genetic Analysis in Eukaryotic Microbes . Good. General factors . step one. dos. Tetrad studies . B. Hereditary research particularly bacteria 1. Aspergillus nidulans . . dos. Aspergillus niger and other “imperfect” fungi step 3. Neurospora crassa . 4. Most other ascomycetes . 5. Yeasts . 6. Filamentous basidiomycetes . 7. Ustilago . 8. Chlamydomonas reinhardii . nine. Ciliates . ten. Slime moulds VI. Genetic Data within the Prokaryotes . Good. General factors . step one. Fertility types and you may conjugational mapping . 2. Transduction and you will co-transduction . 3. Conversion and you can co-sales 4. Non-selective analysis .

50 51 57 61 61 65 66 69 69 73 75 77 78 80 81 81 83 84 91 94

Hereditary study in particular organisms step one. Escherichia coli, Salmonella typhimurium or other Enteric germs . dos. Pseudomonas aeruginosa and you may Ps. putida . step three. Bacillus subtilis cuatro. Streptmyces coelicolor and other actinomycetes . 5. Almost every other bacteria C. Authoritative mapping actions separate regarding recombination VII. Genetic Data inside the Viruses An excellent. General considerations . step 1. Form of widespread genomes dos. Great features of trojan genes B. Genetic analysis specifically viruses 1. Bacteriophages dos. Animal worms step 3. Plant viruses VIII. Finishing Responses Sources .